A piece of writing passes through many hands before it gets published. This is especially true with book-length manuscripts. But even with short stories and essays, there are still countless people involved. There is, for instance, the writer, the writer’s support group, the agent, the publisher (sometimes more than one publisher), the editor, the copyeditor and so on. But really, there are really only the two sides: the side of creation and the side of completion. At some point along the line of hands-involved, it goes from being about
getting it down to being about
getting it right.
Over the past five months, I’ve been involved with the publication of my university’s literary journal. The experience provided me the opportunity to spend some time on the “other side.” I went from being the creator to being the publisher. I wasn’t, of course,
the publisher. But I was asked to think like one. I was asked to consider the merit and relevance of each piece, and how potential pieces played against each other. I was asked to defend my reasons for advocating on behalf of one piece and my reasons for rejecting another. I was asked to think in terms of the big picture and to simultaneously pay attention to the smallest of details. And by doing all of this—by juggling these responsibilities—I am now certain of two things: publishing is not for me and writing most definitely is.
The brutal reality of publishing is that the odds are against each and every piece. We began with over four hundred submissions and are only going to publish eight. The reasons something gets in are usually simple—the writing is strong, the story is strong, the voice is strong, the problems are few and far between. But the reasons something doesn’t get in are often much harder to define—the first readers didn’t like it, the editors had mixed reactions, there were maybe some problems with craft or grammar, there was a similar and stronger piece.
All of these could be the culprit, but it could also be something else altogether. The one exception to this is stuff that is truly bad. And while very few stories and essays would fit into this category, there are always enough duds in a pile to make this a legitimate concern. What’s tricky is trying to explain to someone (or to yourself, if you’re a writer) that if something is truly good, it will eventually get published, while also reminding them that it’s not just about having a dozen pages double-spaced and tenacity.
In this day and age, with technology aplenty and every reason to chase your dreams, there are
thousands of writers-to-be,
hundreds of publications and
dozens of readers. It’s an unhealthy food chain. Even I, someone who is by most standards a serious reader, must admit that I had never read a literary journal cover-to-cover before getting my feet wet with my school’s. I also have to admit that I have always thought (and still struggle with whether) there are too many places a story can be published—too many literary journals.
I can’t decide, however, where the blame should be put. Certainly, any place that is still fighting the good fight should be applauded, but ultimately, does having all this literature really contribute to the cause? I’d like to think so, but the skeptic in me is inclined to believe the opposite. A hundred years ago, there were no MFA programs and very few literary journals. What got published was the absolute best of the best. And while this would have wiped my future off the board, I think it did raise the overall standard to a much higher level than what we have now. But then again, one hundred years ago, there were no TVs or video games or internet…all of which literature has to now go up against.
Stephen King, as the guest editor of the
2007 Best American Short Stories, said in his introduction: “So—American short story alive? Check. American short story well? Sorry, no, can’t say so. Current condition stable, but apt to deteriorate in the years ahead.”
I have to agree. Maybe there are too many publications—too many literary journals. But I also have to say this: readers or no readers, writers and publishers need to keep at it. This is a noble fight we’re in, and while there are the two sides to what we’re doing—the creating and the completing, let me be clear: we’re all in it together.
Sick or strong, big or small, there will always remain a culture of words and stories.
Maybe there are too many words being sent to too few people. Maybe the standards are lower than they were before. And maybe the future is less than desirable. But I still believe that there are stories out there that need to be read, and that without little journals like ours, and without the hard work of everyone behind the scenes, these stories would disappear into the great and distant silence. So…
Go, Lit Mag, Go!